Find the repeated work your team should automate
Start with 5-20 seats, one named workflow, and one week of captured work. Screenpipe turns real activity into a repeated-action report your ops, IT, and AI teams can evaluate.
Automation projects start too late
Most teams choose automation targets from interviews, dashboards, or the loudest complaint. The repeated work usually hides between apps.
ERP and CRM logs miss spreadsheet, email, browser, chat, and meeting context
SOP workshops describe the official process, not the messy human version
Teams buy automation before proving which workflow is worth automating
Security and privacy questions get answered after rollout instead of before it
A workflow report from observed work
Screenpipe captures approved desktop activity during a scoped pilot and summarizes recurring workflows, repeated actions, automation candidates, SOP drafts, agent/eval specs, confidence notes, and privacy assumptions.
Recurring workflow map
Group repeated sequences across apps, meetings, browser tabs, spreadsheets, and internal tools.
SOP draft
Turn observed steps into a written procedure with inputs, outputs, edge cases, and owner notes.
Automation candidates
Rank workflows by repetition, friction, confidence, and how clearly an agent could attempt them.
Privacy notes
Document data-flow boundaries, redaction assumptions, retention, and what was excluded from the report.
How it works
Pick one workflow
Choose a repeated process such as Excel to ERP entry, vendor bill matching, CRM updates, or weekly ops reporting.
Scope the pilot
Define users, devices, deployment mode, retention, employee controls, approved data flows, and the success metric.
Capture real work
Run Screenpipe during normal work so the report reflects actual screens, apps, meetings, and handoffs.
Review the report
Use the repeated-action report to decide whether to automate, generate an SOP, build an agent eval, or stop.